Opinion 
 Blogs 
 National Comment 
 Next week the Boomers go bust 

Next week the Boomers go bust

Either way next week, the US presidential election is the kiss of death to the short, unhappy rise to power of the baby-boomer generation. If Republican John McCain defies the polls and wins, it will be a repudiation of 16 years of Boomer rule. At 72, McCain's is the generation the Boomers disrespected.

But if Barack Obama wins, he will be the generational switch that consigns the Boomers to history, with the median age of the American voter at 45.

He is at the vanguard of the Brady Bunch generation - the Obama Bunch. His wife, Michelle (born 1964), can pick every episode of the seminal 1970s family sitcom just from the opening seconds.

The Brady Bunch aired when the Boomers were at school, but it was generation X who turned it into a hit, in endless reruns they could never get enough of. At one point in the 1970s, American TV stations were airing four episodes a day. It was the story of a wholesome blended family, six children, vaguely hip step-parents, Alice the housekeeper, unstated sexual tension and the sly knowingness of Marcia, the oldest daughter.

Only devotees can understand how this bland show resonated with generation X around the world, how it offered a respite from Boomer mayhem.

Whether you call Obama a tail-end Boomer or a first run generation X-er, his birth year of 1961 puts him at the sublime point between the generations. It's not a fault line because these in-betweeners never really rebelled against their elders, whose self-centred hubris and lack of seriousness has now plunged the world into a cold bath.

The golden age of Boomer leaders around the world has not exactly been a great success - from Clinton (1946), Bush (1946), Brown (1951), Putin (1952) and Blair (1953) to Rudd (1957), the generation who assumed by force of numbers and breezy self-confidence they should rule the world have dropped the baton, most egregiously in the current financial crisis. Obama's sensibility is with generation X, and he has chosen to be their elder statesmen rather than tagalong kid brother to the Boomers.

Obama's generation missed the sexual revolution of the 1960s - he was six in the Summer of Love. But they were in a prime position to watch the Boomers go wrong. They absorbed echoes of Woodstock, Vietnam, the social dislocation, with parents, perhaps, like Obama's mother, who were caught up in the heat of the time. They experienced first-hand the chaos of old certainties being torn apart. Then they watched the anti-establishmentarians become the establishment, and sniffed it for the phoniness it was.

McCain could have made a virtue of his age, as the anti-Boomer. Instead he made the fatal mistake of running as the "maverick".

The only way McCain was going to get people enthused to vote for a cranky 72-year-old with a croaky voice and various pre-TV quirks, such as saying "my friend" repeatedly, was to convince them he was the stable, sunny Gipper type, with all the answers amid economic uncertainty. But he has turned his virtue into a liability by mistaking non-conformity for youthfulness and vitality.

There is no room in life for a 72-year-old maverick. At 72 you should have figured out the world, and not still be railing against the guys that run it. He should not have abruptly suspended his campaign when Wall Street went into meltdown. He should not have sung "bomb, bomb Iran". These are not the marks of a dependable elder statesman, but of a man who can't discipline himself.

Obama, on the other hand, is all discipline.

In his autobiography, Dreams From My Father, he describes the shock, at nine, of seeing a magazine photograph of a man who had chemically lightened his complexion to look like a white man.

"I felt my face and neck get hot. My stomach knotted; the type began to blur on the page. Did my mother know about this? … I had a desperate urge to jump out of my seat … to demand some explanation or assurance. [But] by the time my mother came to take me home, my face wore a smile and the magazines were back in their proper place."

The dangerous Obama his opponents have painted does not align with the Obama we see on YouTube, when he talks respectfully for six minutes to "Joe the plumber".

Nor does it gel with the Obama who emerges in his book, with its brutally honest portrait of his father, the Kenyan student who met his white mother at university in Hawaii, and left a year after his birth.

In high school, he lived with his grandparents in Hawaii, where: "I was engaged in a fitful interior struggle … trying to raise myself to be a black man in America."

He would find himself talking about "white folks [and] I would suddenly remember my mother's smile, and the words … would seem awkward and false".

There's another aspect of Obama's personality that adds to the sense older people have that he is ill-defined and aloof. He is a "transit lounger" - a phrase coined in 1997 by the writer Pico Iyer to describe a globalised generation. "We pass through countries as through revolving doors, resident aliens of the world, impermanent residents of nowhere. Nothing is strange to us, and nowhere is foreign. We are visitors even in our own homes …

"We become professional observers, able to see the merits and deficiencies of anywhere, to balance our parents' viewpoints with their enemies' position … Fervour comes to seem to us the most foreign place of all." It reinforces Obama's generational identity. If it is not place that defines you, it is time.

The cri de coeur of the Obama Bunch is "Marcia Marcia Marcia". Jan's agonised complaint about her big sister embodies the gen X response to the Boomers - why does it always have to be all about them? Well, maybe it just isn't any more.

devinemiranda@hotmail.com

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size
Page:
1

Comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
I'm 6 months older than Kevin Rudd and my daughter of 26 thinks she has 'life experience'. I cherished the 1967-71 when Woodstock 'happened'. I have an activist spirit, that my 26year old offspring has no 'travail of spirit'. As Jim Morrison wrote "The human race is dying out, no one left to scream and shout, people walking on the moon, smog's gonna get you really soon". No, now we have monotone experts, economics with sensible predictions- mundane political correctness that shy's away from being too emphatic. I hate it. The papers monitor our 'opinions' so that we all are more politically 'balanced'. I long for the days "when the moon is in the 7th house and Jupiter aligns with Mars". No, all prohibited now. So my daughter and I have 2 subjects that we do not discuss- mortgages with $300,000 borrowings and her sister's stupidity. Alas, I concluded to her "We now have a generation gap between us" We have a boring Xmas, an emailed 'Father's Day' and a disintegrated family. No wonder the Brady's had some fantasy where Mum& Dad were part of a family. My Dad died this year and no-one cares about the memory anymore. I feel sad that this X gen. is so shallow, valueless and boring. Sincerely Stephen J
Posted by adaptapensioner.com on 30/10/2008 11:13:30 PM
As many prominent experts have noted, Obama is a member of Generation Jones–born 1954-1965, between the Boomers and GenXers. Here's a recent 5 minute GenJones video features many top pundits (including David Brooks, Clarence Page, Dick Morris, Juan Williams, Karen Tumulty, Howard Wolfson, Michael Barone, etc.) specifically talking about Obama (and Palin’s) membership in Generation Jones, as well as the surprisingly big role that GenJones is now playing in this election: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Ta_Du5K0jk And here is a clip from a couple of days ago from a discussion about Generation Jones on MSNBC: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZIrjn50E2_I
Posted by ElectionWatcher on 31/10/2008 2:04:48 AM
What a strange article. I'm 51 years old, and fervently hoping for an Obama victory. What's that got to do with a notional stereotype called Boomers?? As a useful comparison, try reading the article whilst substituting a racial stereotype for the word boomers.
Posted by Crikey on 31/10/2008 8:16:12 AM
What a strange article. I'm 66 years old and fev........... What an observant comment.
Posted by watcher on 1/11/2008 1:54:27 AM
I agree with Crikey. It is not as if the Brady's are any beacon of hope. Dad Brady couldn't come out about his real sexuality whilst mum and Greg Brady (stepson) had a raging affair. Sounds like Miranda (Gen X ???) is hypothesising again. A way too generalised and unsubstantiated point of view that just doesn't reflect the diversity of our complex society.
Posted by Mark on 2/11/2008 8:35:24 AM
The U.S. Election campaign is nothing but a circus, with the most entertaining performer, who has spent the most money on the campaign, gaining the advantage. Speeches full of promise do not erase the past, nor do they obscure the financial instability the U.S. market has inflicted on the rest of the world. Please wake me when the election is over! Stereotyping voters and candidates only represent an exercise in self-indulgence for the writer. Who really cares!
Posted by Marie Jacqueline Lee on 2/11/2008 3:09:32 PM
National Comment
Here is the place for you to vent on any national or world news and lifestyle stories on the YourGuide websites. If there is anything you see or hear that you like or don't like, tell us. Don't keep it to yourself!

16/12/2008 | So we now have desperate parents attempting to bribe teachers to get their children into a selective high school. What a sad indictment of our education policies, the holy grail of which is parental choice.
Yourguide to Your Toyota
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...